SHIENKER v. COX


35 Misc.2d 184 (1962)

Hyman Shienker, Respondent, v. Ruby Cox, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

July 12, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garfield, Gelman & Garfield (Milton Gelman of counsel), for appellant. Charles H. Fier for respondent.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J. P., HECHT and TILZER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Housing accommodations in a one or two-family house which became vacant after April 1, 1953, are decontrolled, only as long as they are not occupied for other than single-family occupancy. They also remain decontrolled and not subject to rent control where the letting is of nonhousekeeping, furnished housing accommodation, located within a single-dwelling unit not used as a rooming or boarding house, provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases