FRANK v. PENNSYLVANIA R.R.


35 Misc.2d 179 (1962)

Abe Frank, Doing Business as A. B. Frank, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 12, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz (Dennis P. Donovan and Michael J. Shalley of counsel), for appellant. Zelman & Zelman (Benjamin M. Zelman of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J. P., GOLD and CAPOZZOLI, JJ.


Per Curiam.

It was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny an application for interrogatories to obtain essential testimony of two witnesses residing outside the State when the defendant found that they would not appear for trial as anticipated.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

Order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases