1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 138 So.2d
  5. 138 So.2d 75 (1962)
 

STRINGFELLOW v. BREIDEGAM

No. 61-422.

138 So.2d 75 (1962)

H.B. STRINGFELLOW, Appellant, v. Delight R. BREIDEGAM, Individually, I.J. Luman, Individually, and Federal Battery & Cable Mfg. Co., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied March 19, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Agronow & Fensholt, Miami, for appellant.

Irving Steinhardt, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C.J., and HORTON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff's complaint alleging a conspiracy was dismissed and he appealed. The question presented is whether it stated a cause of action for civil conspiracy. We hold that it did not because the allegations purporting to state a cause of action in conspiracy must be clear, positive and specific. Gair v. Lockhart, Fla. 1950, 47 So.2d 826.

The complaint before us sought to imply a conspiracy from the discharge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases