FROOKS v. PECK


35 Misc.2d 177 (1962)

Dorothy Frooks, Respondent, v. George T. Peck, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

February 8, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliott L. Biskind for appellant. Sanford Solarz for respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., GOLD and CAPOZZOLI, JJ.


Per Curiam.

A husband's common-law obligation to answer for his wife's necessary expenses terminated upon the severance of the marital relationship. Therefore, legal services rendered to a former wife in connection with a proceeding to vacate a prima facie valid divorce decree of a sister State, which proceeding was discontinued, are not necessaries for which the former husband is liable.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs and judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases