SURREY REALTY CORP. v. GINSBERG


35 Misc.2d 171 (1962)

Surrey Realty Corp., Respondent, v. Joseph H. Ginsberg, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

March 28, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Gilbert Polinsky and Bernard Meyerson for appellant. Henry S. Salamon and Wallace M. Germain for respondent.

Concur — HART, BROWN and BENJAMIN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

It was error to exclude tenant's proffered testimony with regard to a claimed oral agreement under which he was to remain in possession after the written lease expired. Such testimony, if credited, would tend to prove a new and distinct agreement and would not violate the parol evidence rule.

The final order awarding possession for nonpayment of rent and judgment for rent unanimously should be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases