Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 13 separate dispossess proceedings over a period of 21 months, a final order in favor of the landlord should have been granted. (See 974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ZALAZNICK v. IMBEMBO
35 Misc.2d 164 (1962)
Esther Zalaznick, Appellant, v. Arthur Imbembo, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 14, 1962
June 14, 1962
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Concur — HECHT, J. P., HOFSTADTER and TILZER, JJ.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.