MACE v. CARDONE


35 Misc.2d 163 (1962)

Jack Mace, Appellant, v. Julia Cardone, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 5, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenfeld & Silverman (Sidney B. Silverman of counsel), for appellant. Bennett I. Schlessel for respondent.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J. P., GOLD and CAPOZZOLI, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The certificate of the notary public should have been received as presumptive evidence of the facts contained in such certificate. This evidence would have established a prima facie case calling upon the defendant to offer testimony in contradiction thereof. The refusal of the court to receive the document bearing the certificate in evidence was error.

The judgment should be reversed and a new...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases