KUHN v. HAMILTON

No. 8014.

117 N.W.2d 81 (1962)

Paul KUHN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Echo HAMILTON, Lyle Spicer, Carol Spicer, Emil Bourgois, and all other persons unknown claiming any interest in, or lien or encumbrance upon the property described in the Complaint, Defendants, and Echo Hamilton, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

September 17, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Kelsch, Mandan, for plaintiff and respondent.

Rausch & Chapman, Bismarck, for appellant, Joseph Coghlan, Bismarck, of counsel.


MORRIS, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant Echo Hamilton from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial to the court without a jury. A trial de novo is demanded. The court quieted title in the plaintiff and awarded him a judgment against the appellant for $1,320 rent for the premises in question.

The appellant pleaded and contends that on April 25, 1958, she entered into a contract in writing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases