TROWBRIDGE v. TROWBRIDGE


16 Wis.2d 176 (1962)

TROWBRIDGE, Respondent, v. TROWBRIDGE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 9, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Rubin, Ruppa & Wegner of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Nathan Ruppa.

For the respondent there was a brief by Bass & Goldstein of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Gerald L. Bass and Bernard Goldstein.


FAIRCHILD, J.

1. Alimony freeze. With respect to the alimony awarded, the judgment contained a provision that the monthly payment shall be constant and neither party "shall be allowed, for any reason whatsoever, to come into this court to either raise or reduce said sum of Two Hundred and Fifty ($250) Dollars per month."

Sec. 247.32, Stats., provides:

"After a judgment providing for alimony . . . the court may, from time to time, on the petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases