1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 72 N.J.
  5. 72 N.J. Super. 118 (1962)
 

DANISI v. THUEMLING

72 N.J. Super. 118 (1962)

178 A.2d 26

JOSEPH DANISI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWIN J. THUEMLING AND ELDON E. BETTS, DEFENDANTS, AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Re-argued January 15, 1962.

Decided January 30, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bruce D. Herrigel argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Herrigel and Herrigel, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore I. Botter, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board of New Jersey (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and LEWIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.A.D.

Defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (hereinafter called the Board) appeals from an order directing it to pay $4,625.75 to plaintiff on account of a judgment obtained by plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident case.

On January 21, 1959 plaintiff, owner of a tractor-trailer which he was operating under a leasing agreement with his employer J & R Transport, was involved in a collision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases