BROCK v. BROCK


35 Misc.2d 124 (1962)

Gladys Brock, Plaintiff, v. Harry Brock, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

June 25, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred F. Ritter for plaintiff. Wolf & Burrell for defendant.


LOUIS B. HELLER, J.

In this separation action plaintiff moves for an order directing the defendant to pay alimony pendente lite as well as a counsel fee. Defendant cross-moves for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that there is a valid and subsisting separation agreement entered into between the parties.

The agreement in addition to the various directives relating to support and maintenance grants the plaintiff wife the option...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases