KIMBERLINE v. PLANNING BOARD OF CAMDEN


73 N.J. Super. 80 (1962)

178 A.2d 678

ALICE P. KIMBERLINE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, AN AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided March 1, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William C. Gottshalk for the plaintiffs.

Mr. George E. Stransky, Jr., for the defendant City of Camden.

Mr. William J. Shepp for the defendant Planning Board of the City of Camden.

Mr. Martin F. McKernan for the defendant Housing Authority of the City of Camden.

Mr. Russell E. Watson for the defendant Rutgers, The State University (Messrs. R.E. & A.D. Watson, attorneys).


SCHALICK, J.S.C.

This is an action in lieu of prerogative writs to test the validity of a determination of the Planning Board of the City of Camden and the approval of the city council of Camden that a certain area is blighted pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55-21.1 et seq.

The action against Rutgers, The State University, as a defendant was discontinued at the pretrial.

Plaintiffs own seven properties in the area. The area in question is bounded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases