1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 16 Wis.2d
  5. 16 Wis.2d 135 (1962)
 

TULLGREN v. SCHOOL DIST.

16 Wis.2d 135 (1962)

TULLGREN, Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1 OF VILLAGE OF WHITEFISH BAY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 6, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Irving A. Puchner, attorney, and Martin J. Torphy and Harold W. Story of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Puchner and Mr. Torphy.

For the respondent there was a brief by von Briesen & Redmond, attorneys, and George F. Redmond and John J. Burke of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by George F. Redmond.

GORDON, J.

Three principal arguments are advanced by the appellant, Mrs. Tullgren. First, she contends that the assignment to Mr. Herbst on December 12, 1944, did not transfer all her interests in the 1931 and 1941 contracts. Secondly, she contends that the school district had notice of the separate agreement between herself and Mr. Herbst and, therefore, the termination agreement between the school district and Mr. Herbst in 1948 was a violation of her known rights...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases