SHUMAKER v. HAZEN

No. 39646.

372 P.2d 873 (1962)

Roselie SHUMAKER, Plaintiff in Error, v. S. Paul HAZEN, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 19, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant C. Aadnesen, Salt Lake City, Utah, Hudson, Hudson, Wheaton & Kyle, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Robert W. Raynolds, J.W. Hastain, Tulsa, S. Paul Hazen, Tulsa, pro se, for defendant in error.


JOHNSON, Justice.

The defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, filed this action against plaintiff in error (defendant) in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, alleging in his first cause of action that defendant was the owner of 12,700 shares of the capital stock of the Utex Exploration Co., a mining corporation; that the defendant employed plaintiff to investigate said company and effect a sale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases