PER CURIAM.
Appellant and his co-defendant, Flurry, were convicted of housebreaking, 22 D.C.Code § 1801, primarily on the testimony of two policemen. Appellant, taking the stand in his own behalf, admitted being in the vicinity of the store concerned in the charge at 3:00 o'clock in the morning, but denied that either he or his companion, Flurry, had entered it.
While Flurry was on the witness stand, the following colloquy occurred in the presence of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.