HOLLAND v. SANFAX CORPORATION

39342, 39343, 39344.

106 Ga. App. 1 (1962)

126 S.E.2d 442

HOLLAND v. SANFAX CORPORATION. HOLLAND v. CENTER. HOLLAND v. SANDLER.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 9, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reuben A. Garland, for plaintiff in error.

Gambrell, Harlan, Russell, Moye & Richardson, Robert R. Richardson, Edward W. Killorin, contra.


HALL, Judge.

1. The Summary Judgment Act of 1959 is substantially identical with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure, 28 U. S.C.A. Rule 56. Therefore, it is appropriate that we resort to "Federal cases" as to its construction. Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, 105 Ga.App. 70, 72 (123 S.E.2d 693). See Echols v. Thompson, 211 Ga. 299

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases