MARYLAND SHIPBUILDING & DRY. CO. v. PACIFIC RULER CORP.


201 F.Supp. 858 (1962)

MARYLAND SHIPBUILDING & DRY-DOCK CO., Libelant, v. PACIFIC RULER CORPORATION, Respondent.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 9, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foley & Martin, New York City, for libelant.

Poles, Tublin & Patestides, New York City, for respondent. John G. Poles, Christ Stratakis, New York City, of counsel.


DAWSON, District Judge.

The respondent in this action has obtained an order requiring the libelant to show cause why an order should not be made pursuant to Rule 21 of the Admiralty Rules of this court and Rule 58 of the Admiralty Rules of the Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C.A. vacating the attachment made against the property of the respondent and dismissing the libel. The libel claims $17,340 for repairs and supplies furnished by the libelant to a vessel owned by the respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases