1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 305 F.2d
  5. 305 F.2d 753 (1962)
 

HENRY v. AUCHINCLOSS, PARKER & REDPATH

Nos. 16503, 16504.

305 F.2d 753 (1962)

Sarah E. HENRY, Appellant, v. AUCHINCLOSS, PARKER & REDPATH, a partnership, and Hugh D. Auchincloss et al., Appellees. Hugh D. AUCHINCLOSS et al., Appellants, v. UNION TRUST COMPANY OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided May 10, 1962.

Petition for Rehearing Denied July 31, 1962.

Petition for Rehearing Denied July 31, 1962.

As Amended July 31, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Donald S. Caruthers, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. E. W. Mollohan, Jr., and George Johannes, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant in No. 16503.

Mr. Preston C. King, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Alexander M. Heron and Edgar T. Bellinger, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees in No. 16503, and submitted on the briefs for appellants in No. 16504.

Mr. John L. Hamilton, with whom Mr. William A. Glasgow, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, submitted on the brief for appellees Union Trust Company of the District of Columbia and Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., in No. 16504.

Messrs. Donald S. Caruthers and E. W. Mollohan, Jr., Washington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee Sarah E. Henry in No. 16504.

Before EDGERTON, WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition for Rehearing by the Division in No. 16503 Denied July 31, 1962.

Petition for Rehearing En Banc in No. 16503 Denied En Banc July 31, 1962.

PER CURIAM.

No. 16,503 is an action for damages for the allegedly unauthorized sale by defendants-appellees, who are engaged in the security brokerage business, of securities of the plaintiff-appellant Sarah Henry. At the close of all the evidence, the District Court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases