FILICE v. BOCCARDO

Docket No. 20532.

210 Cal.App.2d 843 (1962)

26 Cal. Rptr. 789

FRANK H. FILICE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAMES F. BOCCARDO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

December 17, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank H. Filice, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Leslie L. Roos, Morgan, Beauzay & Holmes and Robert Morgan for Defendants and Respondents.


SHOEMAKER, J.

Plaintiff Frank H. Filice appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after defendants' demurrers were sustained without leave to amend.

This action is one to recover damages allegedly resulting from a fraudulent conspiracy perpetrated by defendants James Boccardo, Robert Popelka, Doctor W. Henry Harper, Robert Cimino, Elmer Collett, 15 John Does, and 5 Jane Does.

The pleading is most difficult to follow; however, we believe we have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases