Appellant employer, Tracy-Smith Co., Inc., and its carrier contend that claimant was not an employee of Tracy-Smith but was that of respondent employer, Central Rigging and Contracting Corporation, or that at most Tracy-Smith was a special employer and Central Rigging the general employer. In its work of installing and servicing printing presses, Tracy-Smith required riggers but could not hire them because it had no contract with their union and in consequence
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MICELI v. TRACY-SMITH CO., INC.
17 A.D.2d 1021 (1962)
In the Matter of the Claim of Dominick Miceli, Respondent, v. Tracy-Smith Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and Central Rigging and Contracting Corp. et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 30, 1962
November 30, 1962
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
