Appellants rely upon the medical evidence as to permanency adduced from the attending neurosurgeon, but his opinion that a permanent condition existed was not reached until after the second injury. This expert further testified that he examined the claimant 12 days before the second accident and that he "would have been unable to venture an opinion [as to permanency] at that time", and, when asked whether it would "take some time following that examination before you can...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
