LEDERMAN v. LEDERMAN


33 Misc.2d 997 (1962)

Marie J. Lederman, Plaintiff, v. Theodore Lederman, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

February 7, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erdheim & Armstrong for defendant. Elman & Ornstein for plaintiff.


BENJAMIN BRENNER, J.

This is a strenuously contested separation action. Defendant husband moves to vacate a notice for his examination served upon him under rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice and to quash a subpœna served upon his employer, a New Jersey corporation. He argues that an examination in a matrimonial action may be had only upon an order therefor, obtained pursuant to section 292 of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases