1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 202 F.Supp.
  5. 202 F.Supp. 824 (1962)
 

BREVEL PRODUCTS CORP. v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATION

202 F.Supp. 824 (1962)

BREVEL PRODUCTS CORP., Plaintiff, v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATION, Seidelhuber Steel Rolling Mill Corp., Big Boy Manufacturing Co. and Masters, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 28, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amster & Levy, New York City, Morton Amster, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, Robert S. Carlson, New York City, of counsel, for defendants.

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion brought by Big Boy Manufacturing Co., one of the defendants in the above captioned action, to dismiss the complaint as against it pursuant to Rule 12(b) (3) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., on the ground of improper venue. The complaint charges the defendants with patent infringement and prays for injunctive relief as well as for an accounting and damages flowing from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases