Petitioner attacks the charges as vague and indefinite; and, as originally constituted, they were. However, they were rendered more specific by a bill of particulars, whereupon petitioner proceeded to trial without objection. Under the circumstances, we find them sufficient, insofar as they relate to payments of money by Espinosa, Benitez and Marrero, as specified in the bill of particulars. There was proof of several transactions of Espinosa and Benitez with petitioner which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.