HOOD, Chief Judge.
The question here is the correctness of the trial court's finding that appellant assumed the payment of a second deed of trust and was therefore liable for the deficiency existing after foreclosure.
The deed of trust and note secured by it were executed by appellees as part of the purchase price of real property. Some years later they entered into a contract to sell the property to appellant. The contract recited that appellant was to "assume...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
