1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 366 Mich.
  5. 366 Mich. 638 (1962)
 

DET. EDISON CO. v. EAST CHINA TWP. SCH. DIST.

Docket Nos. 57-61, Calendar Nos. 49,485, 49,498-49,501.

366 Mich. 638 (1962)

115 N.W.2d 298

DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v. EAST CHINA TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 18, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fischer, Sprague, Franklin & Ford (George H. Meyer, of counsel), for plaintiff Detroit Edison Company.

Marshall Barrymore, for plaintiffs Gauthier and others.

Walsh, O'Sullivan, Stommel & Sharp (Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, of counsel), for defendant East China School District.

SOURIS, J.

The principal question presented in this appeal is whether certain actions taken by the school districts of Marine City, East China township and city of St. Clair were consolidation proceedings or annexation proceedings within the meaning of the school code of 1955.1 At a higher level of abstraction, the principal question can be stated as follows: Can school districts be joined by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases