In October, 1959 appellant was required to appear at a hearing before the Industrial Commissioner. In accordance with a subpœna duces tecum issued pursuant to section 39 of the Labor Law appellant produced the books and records in question at the hearing. Whether appellant voluntarily left these books and records with the Industrial Commissioner is disputed. In January, 1960 the Industrial Commissioner determined that appellant had obtained unemployment benefits by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
