Appellants concede that the record presents no factual dispute. They state the issue here to be "Whether as a matter of law, the feeblemindedness of the claimant classifies him as a dependent totally blind or physically disabled child within the meaning of Subdivision 1-A of Section 16 of the Workmen's Compensation Law." They argue that the statutory definition of dependency bars an award to a surviving dependent adult child permanently and totally disabled solely by reason...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.