1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 34 N.J.
  5. 34 N.J. 63 (1961)
 

STATE v. PHILLIPS

34 N.J. 63 (1961)

167 A.2d 175

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD PHILLIPS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF HAROLD PHILLIPS, APPELLANT, FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 23, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William C. Brudnick, Special Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Charles Handler argued the cause for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 62 N.J.Super. 70 (1960). Moreover, we conclude that the record reveals no substantial state or federal constitutional question which would justify direct appeal to this Court. R.R. 1:2-1; Colacurcio Contracting Corp. v. Weiss, 20 N.J. 258 (1955); Starego v. Soboliski,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases