HIRSCH v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY

No. 292, Docket 26706.

288 F.2d 685 (1961)

Eugen HIRSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided April 13, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugen Hirsch, pro se.

Edward J. Reilly, Jr., New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The issue on this appeal is whether the trial judge properly directed a verdict for the defendant at the conclusion of the proof. As we find that the evidence presented an issue of fact which was the sole province of the jury to pass upon, we reverse the judgment of the district court.

When this case came before us in 1958 on appeal from the dismissal of the complaint, we treated it as an appeal from summary judgment and we held that the pleadings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases