1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 175 A.2d
  5. 175 A.2d 782 (1961)
 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. MOODY

Nos. 2855, 2856.

175 A.2d 782 (1961)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant, v. Ione MOODY, Appellee. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant, v. Walter HILL and Frank W. Hamilton, Appellees.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided December 7, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Prin. Asst. Corp. Counsel, and David P. Sutton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant

No appearance for appellees.

Before HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges, and SMITH, Chief Judge of The Municipal Court for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from an apparent conflict between the provisions of Code 1951, §§ 22-109 and 23-101. The question presented on brief and at oral argument is whether the Corporation Counsel or the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia is authorized by Congress to prosecute violators of Code 1951, § 22-3112.

Appellees were charged with destruction of private property in violation of Code 1951, § 22-3112. Prosecution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases