Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered.
On the evidence adduced a close question of fact was presented as to the identity of the person who had committed the crime. In support of the complainants' evidence the arresting officer was permitted to testify that at the time of the arrest both complainants had identified the defendant. The admission of such testimony by the officer was error. In our opinion, under the circumstances here disclosed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
