BISTANY v. McGEE

No. 236.

118 S.E.2d 797 (1961)

254 N.C. 326

Joseph Daniel BISTANY v. Walter Boyce McGEE and Betty Dixon McGee.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 22, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Rush, John F. Ray and Charles T. Myers, Charlotte, N. C., for plaintiff, appellee.

Pierce, Wardlow, Knox & Caudle and Stuart R. Childs, Charlotte, for defendant, appellant.


PER CURIAM.

The conclusion reached is that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, presented a question for jury determination upon the issues submitted. Defendant's motions for judgment of nonsuit were properly overruled.

Careful consideration of each of the assignments of error brought forward and discussed in defendant's brief fails to disclose any error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases