Judgment affirmed, without costs.
The subject mortgage was given by the mortgagors, defendants Thomas, at the time they took title to the real property in question. At the same time the mortgage was assigned to plaintiffs. Usury may not be claimed as a defense against enforcement of a purchase-money mortgage, unless the mortgage was utilized as a cloak to cover a truly usurious loan (Del Rubio v. Duchesne, 284 App. Div. 89; Butts v. Samuel,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.