OAKLAND COUNTY v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD

Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 48,780.

363 Mich. 539 (1961)

110 N.W.2d 812

COUNTY OF OAKLAND v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided September 21, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman R. Barnard, Corporation Counsel, Charles A. Davis and Robert P. Allen, Assistant Corporation Counsel, for plaintiff.

James C. Allen, for defendant City of Southfield.

Thomas J. Dillon, Jr., for defendant Township of Southfield.


The plaintiff county, relying particularly on section 26 of the home-rule act,* sued to compel reimbursement by the defendant city and the defendant township for expenditures made pursuant to statute in the course of abortive attempts to incorporate portions of the defendant township. Plaintiff had judgment as shown below. Defendants appeal.

The case comes here on an agreed statement of facts presenting the agreed question of statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases