Order affirmed.
In substance, the coram nobis application was based upon the ground that error was committed at the trial by receiving in evidence the testimony by one Thuna as to admissions made to him by defendant subsequent to defendant's indictment, while they were both confined in the Richmond County jail; and that the reception of such evidence violated defendant's constitutional rights within the doctrine of People v. Di Biasi (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.