1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 290 F.2d
  5. 290 F.2d 595 (1961)
 

MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. v. CROWN 400 CORP.

Patent Appeal No. 6691.

290 F.2d 595 (1961)

MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, v. CROWN 400 CORPORATION, Appellee.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark W. Gehan, Charles H. Lauder, Carpenter, Abbott, Coulter & Kinney, St. Paul, Minn., for appellant.

Martin J. Brown, Adams, Forward & McLean, Robert B. Harmon, Washington, D. C. (Malcolm S. Bradway, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

The sole issue here is whether there is likelihood of purchaser confusion within the meaning of Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052(d) between the marks of the parties when applied to their respective goods. The trademark Trial and Appeal Board held in the negative and dismissed an opposition by appellant, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, to an application by appellee, Crown 400 Corporation, for registration of ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases