HOYLE v. BAGBY

No. 672.

117 S.E.2d 760 (1961)

253 N.C. 778

D. B. HOYLE v. J. A. BAGBY, d/b/a J. A. Bagby Construction Company.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 20, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams & Zimmerman, Durham, for defendant, appellant.

Lester W. Owen, Durham, for plaintiff, appellee.


HIGGINS, Justice.

Counsel for plaintiff, during the argument here, moved for leave to amend the complaint in order to amplify his allegations of fraud. However, neither the motion, nor the proposed amendment, was reduced to writing and filed in this Court as required by Rule 36, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 566. The motion and amendment are not in compliance with the rules and the Court cannot consider them.

The plaintiff alleged the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases