RUSHLIGHT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 16834.

294 F.2d 572 (1961)

RUSHLIGHT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. RUSHLIGHT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 23, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Denton G. Burdick, Jr., Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, A. F. Prescott, Helen A. Buckley and Arthur Gould, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN, District Judge.


BOWEN, District Judge.

The 1953 fiscal year's income of a joint venture, of which Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. (the defendant below, being both appellant and appellee here, and hereinafter referred to as Rushlight) was a member, was pursuant to § 3806(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3806(b), renegotiated for excessive profits by the Los Angeles Regional Renegotiation Board. In September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases