1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 216 Ga.
  5. 216 Ga. 646 (1961)
 

BOWER v. CERTAIN-TEED &c. CORPORATION

21148.

216 Ga. 646 (1961)

119 S.E.2d 5

BOWER v. CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided March 9, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank C. Vann, for plaintiff in error.

Bruce W. Kirbo, Vance Custer, Harold Lambert, Conger & Conger, Leonard Conger, Hemingway & Hemingway, Gambrell, Harlan, Russell, Moye & Richardson, E. Smythe Gambrell, James C. Hill, Harold N. Hill, Jr., contra.

MOBLEY, Justice.

1. The plaintiff contends that Associates Discount should be enjoined from proceeding with a sale of the property covered by its security deed for two reasons: first, because the advertisement of the sale of the property under power fails to show that the property is subject to certain other security deeds which constitute liens superior to that of Associates Discount, and that the sale by Associates Discount will be made

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases