INGERSOLL v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS

Civ. No. 35292.

192 F.Supp. 669 (1961)

Fred W. INGERSOLL et al., Plaintiff, v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al., Defendants and Third-Party-Plaintiffs, v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN, Third-Party-Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

March 13, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chester K. Gillespie, Cleveland, Ohio, and Joseph C. Waddy, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Harold N. McLaughlin and John H. Ritter, of Marshman, Hornbeck, Hollington, Steadman & McLaughlin, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.

Edwin Knachel and John G. Cardinal, of Marshman, Hornbeck, Hollington, Steadman & McLaughlin, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant Nickel Plate.

Harold C. Heiss and Russell B. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant Brotherhood of Firemen & Enginemen.


CONNELL, Chief Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment, injunction and damages, arising under the Railway Labor Act, 48 Stat. 1185, 45 U.S.C. § 151, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151, instituted against the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company. The defendants have in turn impleaded the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, and have jointly moved this Court for a summary judgment. For purposes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases