1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 28 Misc.2d
  5. 28 Misc.2d 816 (1961)
 

BISTRIM v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AUTH.

28 Misc.2d 816 (1961)

George Bistrim et al., Plaintiffs, v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

April 14, 1961

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Sol W. Aronson and Mathilda Miller Cuneo of counsel), for defendant. Pakula & Pakula for plaintiffs.

ANTHONY M. LIVOTI, J.

The defendant moves for an order dismissing the complaint for legal insufficiency pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Although four causes of action are set forth, the first three of which are for money damages and the fourth for a declaratory judgment, the defendant's principal contention as set forth in its brief is that "THE COMPLAINT PRESENTS NO CONTROVERSY FOR THE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases