The final judgment confirmed the report of the three commissioners appointed by the interlocutory judgment, and directed a physical division of the subject premises between the parties and an equalization payment by defendant to the plaintiff. Plaintiff contends: (1) that the direction for a physical partition of the premises instead of their sale was erroneous; (2) that the equalization payment was inadequate; and (3) that the fees awarded the commissioners were grossly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
