Said defendant also appeals from an order, dated March 14, 1960, which purports to deny reargument of the motions which resulted in the order first mentioned. The three actions arose out of an automobile collision in Putnam County. Actions 2 and 3 had been consolidated with Action No. 1, which was pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, after said appellant, a defendant in the three actions, had duly demanded and moved in Action No. 2 for a change of venue from Putnam...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.