MATTER OF ROMAN v. POWER


10 N.Y.2d 793 (1961)

In the Matter of Pablo Roman, Appellant, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Alfred E. Santangelo et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 2, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Narciso Puente, Jr., for appellant.

Max Feigin for Alfred E. Santangelo and others, respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, BERGAN, BOOKSTEIN and BEST.


Order affirmed, without costs. We hold contrary to the holding of the Appellate Division herein that a Committee on Vacancies is not a necessary party in a proceeding such as this. Ordinarily the proceeding would, accordingly, be remanded to Special Term to pass upon the merits but such remand is unnecessary here since the issue tendered has already been disposed of in Matter of Chance v. Power (10 N.Y.2d 792), decided herewith...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases