DANIEL v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS

Docket Nos. 24763, 24707.

190 Cal.App.2d 566 (1961)

12 Cal. Rptr. 226

ELIOT DANIEL et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents. MIRAMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

March 28, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wirin, Rissman, Okrand & Posner, Fred Okrand, Paul M. Posner, Carl B. Sturzenacker and Walter Monarch for Appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Philip E. Grey, Assistant City Attorney, and Arthur Karma, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.


WOOD, P.J.

By stipulation the above entitled actions were consolidated for trial. The plaintiffs in those actions, as taxpayers, sought to enjoin the defendants from using public funds to administer or execute the provisions of section 103.102 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. The alleged basis for seeking the injunction was that the section, on its face, is unconstitutional. In the Daniel case, the plaintiffs also alleged that sections 103.29 and 103.31, as applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases