WEISINGER v. BERFOND


9 N.Y.2d 742 (1961)

Bernard Weisinger, Respondent, v. Bernard Berfond et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 2, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Wilson for Joseph Rae and others, appellants.

Daniel Eisenberg for Bernard Berfond and others, appellants.

Thomas Grimes for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, FROESSEL and BURKE. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents in an opinion in which Judges DYE and FOSTER concur.


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

VAN VOORHIS, J. (dissenting).

Having filed a lis pendens tying up real property, after long and inexcusable delay in bringing the action to trial, and having defaulted in furnishing a bill of particulars in consequence whereof an order of preclusion had been entered preventing the introduction of vital testimony, the action was finally reached for trial. Denied a ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases