1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 193 Cal.App.2d
  5. 193 Cal.App.2d 525 (1961)
 

McAULIFFE v. FOGLESONG

Docket No. 24905.

193 Cal.App.2d 525 (1961)

14 Cal. Rptr. 397

PATRICK W. McAULIFFE, Respondent, v. CLARA M. FOGLESONG, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

June 30, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willedd Andrews for Appellant.

Charles M. Hughes and Ralph St. Sure for Respondent.

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

It is so futile for an appellant to argue, as the defendant does, that the judgment against her is wrong because it is contrary to the testimony that she gave, entirely overlooking the abundant, positive, contrary evidence of the plaintiff. [1-3] It has been so often said, as we find in McKinley v. Buchanan, 176 Cal.App.2d 608, 611 [

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases