SPRADLIN v. CANTON

No. 36649.

171 Ohio St. 531 (1961)

SPRADLIN, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CANTON, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 23, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Brannon & Renswick, for appellant.

Mr. Ian Bruce Hart, for appellee.


O`NEILL, J.

The question presented is: Where a demurrer to a petition is sustained and the plaintiff elects not to plead further and accepts final judgment, is the plaintiff required by law to file a motion for a new trial within the statutory period as a necessary and prerequisite step to perfecting an appeal to the Court of Appeals.

The defendant city of Canton contends that the 1945 amendment to Section 11575...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases