SOTO v. CITY OF NEW YORK


9 N.Y.2d 683 (1961)

Ramon Soto, an Infant, by Gertrude Soto, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided January 20, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Phillips for appellant.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Victor J. Herwitz and Benjamin R. Kaplan of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FROESSEL and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents in an opinion in which Judges FULD and BURKE concur:


Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the allegations of the complaint, the bill of particulars, and the opening statement of plaintiff's counsel, if established by credible proof, would make out a prima facie case sufficient for submission to the jury. (Bowers v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., 282 N.Y. 442, 446; Collentine v. City of New York, 279 N.Y. 119, 124.)

VAN VOORHIS, J. (dissenting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases